Doctoral Liminality and Responsible Conduct Practices in Doctoral Research
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022-10-31
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Journal of Education and Information Technology
Abstract
The complexities of doctoral experiences in many postgraduate schools have become insurmountable. Many
doctoral students are facing numerous challenges in crossing the concept thresholds along the path towards achieving doctorate
degree. With the experience of doctoral studies compared to rite of passage, many doctoral students face periods of confusion
and disorientation hence the liminal period in pursuit of doctoral degree. Many doctoral students may find themselves
engrained in ethical doctoral research challenges, issues, and dilemmas on a regular basis This paper looks at how doctoral
liminality influences responsible conduct practices in doctoral research at Kibabii University, Kenya. The research engaged 13
doctoral candidates and 7 faculty members to evaluate the influence of doctoral liminality on responsible conduct practices in
doctoral research. Data collection tools were validated at a content validity index of 0.83 while reliability index was 0.896.
Descriptive (mean, frequency percentage and standard deviation) and inferential (in particular, regression) analyses were used.
Findings indicate that doctoral liminality has statistically significant influence on responsible conduct practices in doctoral
research. This should help higher education stakeholders to reassess the existing ethical research policies and execution
frameworks. University managements are advised to pursue exemptional awareness and scrutiny on implementation of ethical
practice in doctoral studies.
Description
Journal Article
Keywords
Doctoral Liminality, Conceptual Threshold, Responsible Conduct Practices
Citation
Abuya, J. O., Obino, P. O. & Owoche P. O. (2022) Doctoral Liminality and Responsible Conduct Practices in Doctoral Research. American Journal of Education and Information Technology. 6(2), pp. 103-108. doi: 10.11648/j.ajeit.20220602.16
