Using Digital Tools to Assess Soil Variables in Selected Counties in North Rift, Kenya
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025-03-15
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
AgroEnvironmental Sustainability
Abstract
The need for techniques and instruments that enable rapid soil testing has gained attention in the
face of climate change and environmental degradation. This could improve efficiency and
productivity by providing real-time, high-quality, and accessible data for decision-making. This
study used GPS tools to visualize, analyze, and gather essential field information and applied Near
Infra-Red Spectrometry to assess soil parameters and recommend corrective action for sustainable
livelihood in five Counties in North Rift Kenya. Soil reaction varied from 5.5 in Kaptega, Transnzoia,
to 7.8 in Kospir, Turkana counties. Low soil pH and CEC were recorded in parts of Nandi and
Transnzoia counties. Soils from the dryland ecologies in Turkana, W. Pokot, and Samburu were
predominantly alkaline. Total organic Carbon was generally low in the dryland ecologies of Samburu
and Turkana. Low soil fertility was generally indicated in Samburu, Turkana, and W. Pokot. This was
attributable to the low organic carbon levels and low precipitation, which may have negatively
influenced soil microbial activity. Sustainable farming practices such as crop rotation, mulching,
mixed farming, cover cropping, and minimum/conservation tillage are recommended in areas where
crop cultivation is feasible. Amelioration of soils with agricultural lime and organic matter is highly
recommended in the affected areas within the agropastoral counties for improved production to
guarantee food security and sustainable livelihoods
Description
Journal Article
Keywords
climate change, digital tools, soil variables, sustainable livelihood
Citation
Mutonyi, J., Masayi, N. N., Majengo, C. O., Okello, V. S., Konje, M. M., & Makokha, J. W. (2025). Using Digital Tools to Assess Soil Variables in Selected Counties in North Rift, Kenya. AgroEnvironmental Sustainability, 3(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.59983/s2025030103
